Home > ALEC & The Tax Foundation Describe Ohio’s Unhealthy Business Climate

ALEC & The Tax Foundation Describe Ohio’s Unhealthy Business Climate

April 8, 2010 at 11:40 am Matt Leave a comment Go to comments

First, the American Legislative Exchange Council ranks Ohio’s economic performance as 49th. Thanks for sucking so much, Michigan!

And the Tax Foundation slams Ohio’s Top Revenuer Richard Levin, who was on a PR tour for his boss Gov. Strickland and spinning tax collection figures like crazy. Every single radio and TV report I heard with Levin took his lies quite seriously:

Richard Levin, Ohio’s top revenue official, continues to cheerlead for the state’s broken tax system, as covered by the Urbana Daily Citizen, the Lancaster Eagle Gazette, and the Akron Beacon Journal. Levin’s pronouncement late last month that Ohio is not a high-tax state would normally be dismissed as an April Fool’s Day joke, but he tries to add weight to his claim by citing a report by the Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA).

Levin says the numbers show that Ohio has a middle-of-the-road tax burden, but he is misconstruing Census data and consequently comes to an incorrect conclusion.

Levin’s Numbers from the FTA Are Just State Tax Collections Divided by Population, Which Is Not a Burden Measure and Should Not Be Used to Compare States

The Federation of Tax Administrators’ (FTA) analysis utilizes state tax collections data and population data from the US Census Bureau, and personal income data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Dividing total state tax collections by population and personal income yields the two measures in the FTA’s study: taxes per person and taxes as a percent of income. These calculations show that Ohio’s state tax collections are 35th highest on a per capita basis, and 33rd highest when measured as a percentage of Ohioans’ personal income.

On the surface this type of analysis seems cut and dry, but the numbers are easy to misinterpret. The FTA analysis of Census data used by Levin compares only state tax collections and not state and local tax collections, resulting in an apples-and-oranges comparison due to states having varying levels of local tax powers. (Ohio has high local tax collections.) Census itself warns that its data does not account for tax incidence and should not be used in this way. Yet the FTA and Levin use it in this improper way anyway.

Cherry-Picking State Tax Collections and Not Including Local Tax Collections Provides an Inaccurate Base of Comparison Against Other States

Related posts:

  1. Ohio Taxes are Too High
  2. Ohio’s Business Tax Climate for 2010 is 47th
  3. Attention Heritage Foundation
  4. Ohio Business Development Coalition- “Ohio’s Tax Reform Nearly Complete!”
  5. Ted Strickland and “A Good Climate for Privatization”

    blog comments powered by Disqus
    Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes