Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Cleveland’

The High-Tech Recycling Police in Cleveland

August 27th, 2010 Matt View Comments

Creepy:

It would be a stretch to say that Big Brother will hang out in Clevelanders’ trash cans, but the city plans to sort through curbside trash to make sure residents are recycling — and fine them $100 if they don’t.

The move is part of a high-tech collection system the city will roll out next year with new trash and recycling carts embedded with radio frequency identification chips and bar codes.

The chips will allow city workers to monitor how often residents roll carts to the curb for collection. If a chip show a recyclable cart hasn’t been brought to the curb in weeks, a trash supervisor will sort through the trash for recyclables.

Trash carts containing more than 10 percent recyclable material could lead to a $100 fine, according to Waste Collection Commissioner Ronnie Owens. Recyclables include glass, metal cans, plastic bottles, paper and cardboard.

City Council on Wednesday approved spending $2.5 million on high-tech carts for 25,000 households across the city, expanding a pilot program that began in 2007 with 15,000 households.

$2,500,000 more to spend on an activity which doesn’t help the environment anyway.

This is the goal of the progressive movement: to monitor and control every aspect of your life.

Suddenly, Audi’s Super Bowl commercial doesn’t seem so funny:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Itsy, Bitsy, Fuzzy, Wuzzy Worms in Cleveland

August 3rd, 2010 Matt View Comments

Between having financed projects though Lehman Brothers and trying to deal with the anti-business, uneducated Democrats on the Cleveland city council, this entrepreneur is quite a risk taker:

Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey, Episode 6

March 19th, 2010 Matt View Comments

From Reason.tv:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey, Episode 5

March 18th, 2010 Matt Comments off

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey, Episode 4

March 17th, 2010 Matt Comments off

From Reason.TV:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey, Episode 3

March 16th, 2010 Matt Comments off

From Reason.tv:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey, Episode 2

March 15th, 2010 Matt Comments off

From Reason.tv:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Reason Saves Cleveland with Drew Carey, Episode 1

March 15th, 2010 Matt Comments off

From Reason.TV:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

Cleveland is the Most Miserable City in the Woooooooooooooooorld!

February 18th, 2010 Matt Comments off

From Forbes:

The city of Cleveland has had a colorful history. The Cuyahoga River, which runs through the city, famously caught fire in 1969 thanks to rampant pollution, and it wasn’t the first time. In 1978 it became the first U.S. city to default on its debts since the Great Depression. Cleveland sports fans have had to endure more anguish than those in any other city. The city has been dubbed with a less than endearing nickname: the Mistake by the Lake.

This year Cleveland takes the top spot in our third annual ranking of America’s Most Miserable Cities. Cleveland secured the position thanks to its high unemployment, high taxes, lousy weather, corruption by public officials and crummy sports teams (Cavaliers of the NBA excepted).

Read more here.

No wonder Chris Redfern can’t find any statewide candidates from the Cleveland area. Talented politicians must be too smart to live in that depressing cesspool created by Democrat corruption!

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Tough Issue for Cleveland City Council: Can Transgenders Poop in Either Restroom?

December 1st, 2009 Matt Comments off

From The Plain Dealer:

CLEVELAND, Ohio — Cleveland’s anti-discrimination laws will grow to protect transgender citizens under an ordinance passed Monday by City Council.

Existing city codes prohibit businesses from denying jobs or housing to citizens for reasons of age, race, religion or sexual orientation.

Activists in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community had lobbied for more than a year to include gender identity and expression.

The unanimous vote was the latest step the council has taken to demonstrate a more tolerant atmosphere — one that helped the city land the 2014 Gay Games, an international competition.[...]

One issue they will consider: Allowing transgender citizens to use either a men’s or women’s restroom in public.

Instead of finding new ways that frivolous lawsuits can be filed and with some of the highest property/sales taxes in the state,  just think what Cleveland city council could do if they created a “more tolerant atmosphere” for economic activity?

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,

There is No Such Thing as a Saved Job

November 3rd, 2009 Matt Comments off

And in Ohio, the fuzzy Obama math continues:

The Obama administration announced Friday that federal stimulus money had created or saved about 7,200 education jobs in Ohio as of Sept. 30.

Although a couple of hundred of those jobs were in Columbus City Schools, the district acknowledged yesterday that many of the “saved” jobs definitely wouldn’t have been lost in the first place, and others might not have been lost at all.

Of the 212.5 full-time equivalent jobs the district said were funded with part of the $64 million in stimulus it expects to receive, about 65 percent were “saved,” including 36 principals and assistant principals.

So was the district on the verge of laying off 36 school administrators?

“No,” Dannemiller said, explaining that the reporting choices were “created” and “saved.”

“They weren’t ‘created,’ obviously, so our only other choice was ‘saved.’  ”

The federal Office of Management and Budget told agencies in June to define a “saved” job as “an existing position that would not have been continued to be filled were it not for Recovery Act funding.

And the same sort of logic is used in this NBC 3 Cleveland report, which, without question, buys Gov. Strickland’s claim of grant dollars (corporate welfare) creating or saving jobs:

COLUMBUS — Ohio Governor Ted Strickland announced more than $1 million in funding for economic development projects in the City of Cleveland that are expected to create 40 and retain 625 jobs.

The projects were approved today by the State Controlling Board.

“We are making strategic investments in Ohio communities and businesses to retain jobs and to advance urban redevelopment efforts,” Strickland said.

Flats East Development LLC will receive a $1 million Rapid Outreach Grant for the costs associated with building construction in support of the company’s redevelopment project in the City of Cleveland (Cuyahoga County).

Flats East Development was created in 2005 to lead the redevelopment of 23 acres along the East bank of the Cuyahoga River in downtown Cleveland.

This $250 million project is expected to retain 625 positions.

AIM Pharmakon, Inc. will receive a $50,000 Rapid Outreach Grant for the costs associated with the acquisition of machinery and equipment in support of the company’s project in the City of Cleveland.

AIM offers an array of niche marketing, branding, and sales consulting services for facilitating pharmaceutical commerce. This $1 million project is expected to create 40 jobs.

It could be entirely correct that stimulus and grant dollars created specific jobs or artificially prolonged someones employment. However, not only is this an inefficient use of resources, these are dollars taken out of the economy from elsewhere- ie.,  your and your employer’s pockets.

As Henr Hazlitt explained in his classic economics book from 1946, Economics in One Lesson:

I am here concerned with public works considered as a means of “providing employment” or of adding wealth to the community that it would not otherwise have had.

A bridge is built. If it is built to meet an insistent public demand, if it solves a traffic problem or a transportation problem otherwise insoluble, if, in short, it is even more necessary to the taxpayers collectively than the things for which they would have individually spent their money had it had not been taxed away from them, there can be no objection. But a bridge built primarily “to provide employment” is a different kind of bridge. When providing employment becomes the end, need becomes a subordinate consideration. “Projects” have to be invented. Instead of thinking only of where bridges must be built the government spenders begin to ask themselves where bridges can be built. Can they think of plausible reasons why an additional bridge should connect Easton and Weston? It soon becomes absolutely essential. Those who doubt the necessity are dismissed as obstructionists and reactionaries.

Two arguments are put forward for the bridge, one of which is mainly heard before it is built, the other of which is mainly heard after it has been completed. The first argument is that it will provide employment. It will provide, say, 500 jobs for a year. The implication is that these are jobs that would not otherwise have come into existence.

This is what is immediately seen. But if we have trained ourselves to look beyond immediate to secondary consequences, and beyond those who are directly benefited by a government project to others who are indirectly affected, a different picture presents itself. It is true that a particular group of bridgeworkers may receive more employment than otherwise. But the bridge has to be paid for out of taxes. For every dollar that is spent on the bridge a dollar will be taken away from taxpayers. If the bridge costs $10 million the taxpayers will lose $10 million. They will have that much taken away from them which they would otherwise have spent on the things they needed most.

Therefore, for every public job created by the bridge project a private job has been destroyed somewhere else. We can see the men employed on the bridge. We can watch them at work. The employment argument of the government spenders becomes vivid, and probably for most people convincing. But there are other things that we do not see, because, alas, they have never been permitted to come into existence. They are the jobs destroyed by the $10 million taken from the taxpayers. All that has happened, at best, is that there has been a diversion of jobs because of the project. More bridge builders; fewer automobile workers, television technicians, clothing workers, farmers.

But then we come to the second argument. The bridge exists. It is, let us suppose, a beautiful and not an ugly bridge. It has come into being through the magic of government spending. Where would it have been if the obstructionists and the reactionaries had had their way? There would have been no bridge. The country would have been just that much poorer. Here again the government spenders have the better of the argument with all those who cannot see beyond the immediate range of their physical eyes. They can see the bridge. But if they have taught themselves to look for indirect as well as direct consequences they can once more see in the eye of imagination the possibilities that have never been allowed to come into existence. They can see the unbuilt homes, the unmade cars and washing machines, the unmade dresses and coats, perhaps the ungrown and unsold foodstuffs. To see these uncreated things requires a kind of imagination that not many people have. We can think of these nonexistent objects once, perhaps, but we cannot keep them before our minds as we can the bridge that we pass every working day. What has happened is merely that one thing has been created instead of others.

It doesn’t matter if we are talking about giving ObamaBucks to inefficient public schools or if Gov. Strickland cuts a check to contractors to rebuild part of the Cleveland Flats, this is a redirection of resources taken by force. Therefore, this claimed job creation and retention is only at the cost of destroying jobs and potential investment elsewhere.

However, if they media is going to take the Obama Administration’s ridiculous numbers seriously, perhaps they should mention that, according to Recovery.gov, Ohio has had fewer “created or saved” jobs than Puerto Rico.

Ted Strickland’s TurnAround Ohio Plan Keeps Working: 11.2% Unemployment!

August 21st, 2009 Matt Comments off

From the ODJFS:

Ohio’s unemployment rate was 11.2 percent in July, up slightly from 11.1 percent in June, according to data released this morning by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. Ohio’s nonfarm wage and salary employment increased 9,800 over the month, from 5,113,100 in June to 5,122,900 in July.

“Ohio’s labor market remained relatively unchanged in July,” ODJFS Director Douglas Lumpkin said. “Job gains in service-providing industries were partially offset by job losses in goods-producing sectors.”

The number of workers unemployed in Ohio in July was 664,000, up from 663,000 in June. The number of unemployed has increased by 265,000 in the past 12 months from 399,000. The July unemployment rate for Ohio was up from 6.7 percent in July 2008.

When reached for comment about why the unemployment rate has more than doubled on the Governor’s watch and Ohio now ranks “next to last in economic performance,” Strickland’s robot spokesbabe Amanda Wurst once again said:

wurstgreed2

And in unexpected news, even with OSU and so many government jobs existing in Columbus, the city is apparently worse off than Cleveland. Congratulations Columbus, and good luck with your higher income tax!

At this point, I would typically take yet another obligatory and gratuitous shot at the Governor. But this time, I’ll turn the stage over to SoS Jennifer Brunner, who had this to say to Brent Larkin:

“As one of my supporters in Cleveland suggested, by the time we get to 2010, the governor will be held by the people of Ohio squarely responsible for the economy — deservedly or not,” (Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner) told me last week. “If you have on the top of the ballot the person responsible for Ohio’s economy [Strickland] and the one responsible for providing jobs for Ohio [Fisher, in his former role as development director], that’s not going to play well for Democrats.”

Cleveland & Dayton Dying… Blame Bloggers?

August 15th, 2009 Matt Comments off

From Douglas Belkin in the WSJ:

DAYTON, Ohio — Here’s an idea for saving Rust Belt cities: Tell bloggers and radio stations to stop calling your town a basket case.

That was one suggestion from representatives of eight of the 10 cities labeled last year as America’s fastest dying. They met at the Dayton Convention Center last weekend to swap ideas about how to halt the long skid that’s turned cities like Detroit, Cleveland and Buffalo, N.Y., into shorthand for dystopia.

But Cleveland really is a basket case.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes